A lean university as an innovative model of university management

Lean production is an innovative paradigm, providing an opportunity for a significant increase in the efficiency of enterprises and organizations of various industries. Currently, the high need for personnel with lean competencies and the expansion of the scope of application of the lean production ideology in the Russian economy have led to the emergence of a new model of management organization in a number of universities – «lean universities». The article analyzes the process and the experience of introducing the lean production principles in a number of Russian universities, identifies the main directions for the emergence of positive effects and the possibilities of forming regional educational systems focused on achieving long-term development goals of a lean individual, the formation of a lean culture in each specific region and country. The object of the research is the organizations of the higher education system in Russia, introducing the principles of lean production in their activities and in the management system. The subject of the research is the role and place of universities in the system of forming lean competencies, creating a flow of development of a lean personality. The article examines the main elements of an innovative model of university management based on the principles of frugality. The formation of an appropriate corporate culture is highlighted as the main condition for the effective functioning of such a model. Its functions consist in forming the worldview of a future specialist, actualize the values of lean production in a personality’s socio-psychological structure, cre- ating a special information-transparent communication environment in the organization that promotes the dissemination of ideas of frugality at the university and beyond. Moreover, the article summarizes the experience of foreign universities that implement the ideas of Lean Production in their activities, and draws analogies with the positive effects that can be observed as a result of the implementation of lean production in the practice of the Russian universities.

1. Davydova N.S. The path of a lean personality. Features of the path. M.: Publishing solutions. 2020. 88 p.

2. Davydova N.S., Mazunina S.D., Pozmogova N.P. Organizational and methodological issues of the use of lean technologies in medicine from the point of view of staff motivation and training // Vyatka Medical Bulletin. 2020. No. 1 (65). P. 74–81.

3. Vermennikova L.V., Lupishko A.N., Veselova D.V. Lean-technologies as an effective way of transforming processes and introducing digital technologies in an educational organization // Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: Economics and Law. 2020. Vol. 3, no. 3. P. 325–332.

4. Allu E.L. A. (2019) Lean for sustainable development in South Africa: A case study of three universities. Integrity Journal of Education and Training, Vol. 3(2), р. 22–29. https://doi.org/10.31248/IJET2019.039

5. Balzer W.K. (2010) Lean Higher Education: Increasing the value and performance of university processes, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

6. Balzer W.K., Francis D.E., Krehbiel T.C., Shea N. (2016) A review and perspective on Lean in higher education, Quality Assurance in Education. Vol. 24, No. 4. Р. 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2015-0011

7. Bortollotti T., Boscari, S., Danese P. (2015) Successful lean implementation, organizational culture and soft lean practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, р. 182–201.

8. Carter B., Danford A., Howcroft D., Richardson H., Smith A. and Taylor P. (2011) Lean and mean in the civil service: The case of processing in HMRC. Public Money and Management, 31(2), р. 115–122.

9. Diamond I. (2015) Working smarter 2015. UK: Universities Scotland.

10. El-Sayed M., El-Sayed J., Morgan J., Cameron T. (2011) Lean program and course assessments for quality improvement. International Journal of Process Education, 3(1), р. 65–72.

11. Emiliani M.L. (2016) Evolution in lean teaching. Available at https://bobemiliani.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/eltpaper.pdf. Accessed 15/3/2018.

12. Isaksson R., Kuttainen C., Garvare R. (2013) Lean higher education and lean research. Angelo Conference Proceedings, 16th Toulon-Verona Conference «Excellence in Services» University of Ljubljana, Slovena, (29–30 August 2013). P. 380–391.

13. Moore M., Nash M., Henderson K. (2007). Becoming a Lean University. Best practices of Southern Association of College and University Business Officers (SACUBO). Available at http://www.okyanusbilgiambari.com/bilgiambari/Yalin/Yalin.Egitim/LeanUniversity.Becoming. UnivofCentralOkla.pdf. Accessed 2/2/2018.

14. Nadeau S. (2017) Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma in Higher Education: A Review of Experiences around the World. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, р. 591–603. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2017.75044.

15. Svensson C., Antony J., Ba-Essa M., Bakhsh M. and Albliwi S. (2015) A lean six sigma program in higher education. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 32(9), р. 951–969.

16. Thomas I. (2009). Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. Journal of Transformative Education, 7(3), р. 245–264.

17. Vukadinovic S., Djapan M., Macuzic I. (2017) Education for lean and lean for education: A literature review. International Journal for Quality Research, 11(1), р. 35–50.

18. Yorkstone S. (2016) Lean universities. The Routledge companion to Lean management. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis (Routledge), NY. ISBN: 978-1138920590.