The problem of substantial bases of business-structures (a cenological approach)
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of determining the basis for the evolution of complex economic systems by identifying the driving forces and formalizing the mechanisms of such transformations. The concept of information selection, which is described in Shannon’s information theory criteria, is used as a basic theory, which made it possible to determine the patterns of formation and accumulation of information by economic entities, which is consistent with the concepts of genetic selection in Biology and is used for subsequent formalization. It’s been shown that the difference in economic evolutionary transformations is explained by means of cenological postulates of transformation of complex systems that can be used to describe evolution. Using the example of IT industries, the nature of the manifestation of cenological patterns in the formation of business -ructures with completely new genetic properties has been demonstrated.
About the Authors
A. N. Kuzminov
FSBEI HE “Rostov State Economic University” (RINH)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. G. Paliy
FSBEI HE “Rostov State Economic University” (RINH)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. M. Dzhukha
FSBEI HE “Rostov State Economic University” (RINH)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Кузьминов А.Н. Концептуальная модель ценологического управления в социально-экономических системах // Terra Economicus. 2009. Т. 7, №2-2. С. 28-32.
2. Relevant information in optimized persistence vs. progeny strategies / Polani D [et al] //Proceedings of The 10th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems. Bloomington IN, USA, 2006.
3. Шеннон К. Работы по теории информации и кибернетике. Москва, 1963. С. 243-332.
4. Self-organizing hierarchies in sensor and communication networks / Prokopenko M. [et al] // Artificial Life, Special Issue on Dynamic Hierarchies. 2005. No. 11(4). P. 407-426.
5. Adami C. Introduction to Artificial Life. Springer, 1998.
6. Adami C. What is complexity? // Bioessays. 2002. No. 24(12). P. 1085-1094.
7. Кудрин Б.И. Классика технических ценозов. Общая и прикладная ценология // Ценологические исследования. Вып. 31. Томск: ТГУ-Центр системных исследований, 2006. 220 с.
8. Dawkins R. Universal darwinism. In D. Bendall, editor, Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
9. Колмогоров А. Энтропия в единицу времени как метрический инвариант автоморфизмов // ДАН СССР. 1959. Т. 124. С. 754-755.
10. Polani D., Nehaniv C. L. All else being equal be empowered / Klyubin A.S. [et al] // 8th European Conference, ECAL2005. 2005. Vol. 3630. P. 744-753.
11. Сукиасян С.Г. Биологические и социальные корни поведения человека // Психология и психотехника. 201. №4(91). С. 343-352.
12. Cordes C. Darwinism in economics: from analogy to continuity // J. Evol. Econ. 2006. №16(5). P. 529-541.
13. Junke, T., Hossfeld, U. Die Entdeckung der Evolution, 2nd ED. World Bank, Darmstadt. 2009.
14. Levinthal D.A., Marino A. Three aspects of organizational adaptation: Selection, diversity and plasticity // Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. 2013.
15. Wirtz BW, Mathieu A., Schilke O. Strategy in high-speed environments // Long term plan. 2007. No. 40(3). P. 295-313.
16. Кузьминов А.Н. Методология ценологического анализа социально-экономических систем: монография / Рост. Гос. Ун-т путей сообщения. Ростов-на-Дону, 2009. 257 с.
17. Cavagnari B.M. Regulación de la expresión génica: cómo operan los mecanismos epigenéticos // Archipelago Argent. Pedriatía. 2012. №110(2). P. 132-136.
18. Инновационный потенциал: современное состояние и перспективы развития: монография / В.Г. Матвейкин [и др.]. Москва, 2007. 284 с.
19. David P.A. Why are institutions' bearers of history? Dependence of the path and evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions // Struct. + Edit Econ. Dyn. 1994. No. 5(2). P. 205-220.
20. Iansiti M., Richards G.L. The Ecosystem of Information Technologies: Structure, Health, and Performance [Electronic resurce] // Antitrust bull. 2006. №51(1). P. 77-110. URL: http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24093213
Review
For citations:
Kuzminov A.N., Paliy I.G., Dzhukha V.M. The problem of substantial bases of business-structures (a cenological approach). New Technologies. 2018;(4):132-141. (In Russ.)
Views:
391
Email this article 
