Preview

New Technologies

Advanced search

Influence of agricultural machinery on the potential realization of winter hard wheat yield

https://doi.org/10.47370/2072-0920-2021-17-1-78-86

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of choosing agricultural machinery, as productive potential of plants depends on its effective operation. The correct choice of parameters and modes of agricultural machinery is the fundamental paradigm for solving this problem. Grain yield is made up of the integration of agricultural machinery and its genetic potential. It is the optimization of the parameters that contributes to the formation of a full-fledged desired, stable yield. In the field, productivity is influenced by many difficult-to-control factors (weather conditions, agrotechnical characteristics of the equipment, seed resistance, etc.). To optimize the process of increasing the productivity of grain, the selection of seed material, its disinfection, as well as sowing using innovative technologies are required. The multi-criterion task of choosing the optimal modes of machinery and the preliminary selection and analysis of high-yielding grain is facilitated by the Harrington function. The object of the research is seven varieties of hard winter wheat, differentiated by the method of Kazakova and Lysogorenko. In 2020 high yields were obtained from the varieties of Amazonka (8,32 t/ha), Kristella (8,27 t/ha), Yantarina (8,07 t/ha), Yakhont (7,81 t/ha). Further analysis of seed material by embryo morphotypes (EMT), maximum and minimum mass of an individual grain was carried out using the Harrington function. A comprehensive assessment of the grains of major and minor EMT has shown that the high-yielding varieties of Amazonka and Christella have an optimal weight of 1000 grains, contain the minimum number of grains with minor EMT and the maximum number of seeds with the main EMT. A comprehensive assessment of sowing equipment showed that the use of this technique affects the yield. So when sowing wheat with the SPM-360 seeder, the declared yield is reduced by 10–15%.

About the Authors

A. G. Galayan
The Azov-Black Sea Engineering Institute – a branch of the FSBEI HE «Don State Agrarian University»
Russian Federation

Alla G. Galayan, a postgraduate student

21 Lenin str., Zernograd, the Rostov region, 347740



S. N. Medvedko
FSBI «The North Caucasian State Zonal Machine Testing Station»
Russian Federation

Sofia N. Medvedko, the 1st category engineer

32 Lenin str., Zernograd, the Rostov region, 347740



A. V. Bondarev
The Azov-Black Sea Engineering Institute – a branch of the FSBEI HE «Don State Agrarian University»
Russian Federation

Andrey Vl. Bondarev, a post-graduate student

21 Lenin str., Zernograd, the Rostov region, 347740



V. Y. Chundyshko
FSBEI HE «Maikop State Technological University»
Russian Federation

Vyacheslav Y. Chundyshko, head of the Department of Information Security and Applied Informatics, Candidate of Technical Sciences, an associate professor

191 Pervomayskaya str., Maykop, 385000



References

1. Zhidkov G.A., Lavrukhin P.V., Ivanov P.A. Evaluation of the sowing operation as an element of forecasting the prospects for crop technology // Agricultural machines and technologies. 2012. No. 1. P. 19–21.

2. Kazakova A.S., Lysogorenko M.A. Morphotypes of seed embryos of various varieties of hard winter wheat [Electronic resource] // Living and bio inert systems. 2014. No. 6. URL: http://www.jbks.ru/archive/issue-6/article-11.

3. Medvedko S.N., Zhidkov G.A., Shapovalova L.N. Methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the efficiency of agricultural machines and technologies using the Harrington function // State and prospects for the development of the agro-industrial complex: collection of scientific papers of the XII International scientific-practical conference in the framework of the XXII agro-industrial forum of the South of Russia and the Interagromash exhibition. Rostov on / D: DSTU, 2019. P. 774–777.

4. Sukhanova M.V., Zabrodin V.P., Sukhanov A.V. Ekomix mixer-incrustator -impulse percussion device that excludes injury to seeds during pre-sowing treatment // Scientific life. 2018. No. 6. P. 38–42.

5. Tyuterev S.L. Seeds of grain crops // Plant protection and quarantine. 2005. No. 3. P. 104.

6. Cheremkha B.M. Sowing qualities of winter wheat seeds with different ratios of linear parameters // Selection and seed production. 1989. No. 1.

7. Shevchenko V.T. Morphological and biological studies of common wheat embryos in the light of the doctrine of the different quality of seeds // Biology and technology of seeds. Kharkov, 1974. 209 p.

8. Derera N.F. The effects of preharvest. In Pre Harvest Field Sprouting in Cereals. Boca Raton, Florida: CRCPress. 1993. P. 3–14.

9. Khan M.L. Effects of seed mass on seedling / Act Oc. 2013. No. 25. P. 103-110.

10. Malcolm P.J., Holford P. Temperature and seed weight affect the germination // Sci Hor. 1998. P. 247–256.

11. Mandal S.M., Chakraborty D., Gupta K. Seed Size Variation: Influence on Germination and Subsequent Seedling // Res J of Seed Sci. 2008. No. 1. P. 26–33.

12. Nedeva D., Nicolova A. Fresh and dry weight changes and germination capacity of natural or premature desiccated developing Wheat seeds // Bul Jou Phy. 2009. No. 25. P. 3–15.

13. Sharma R.C., Tiwari A.K., Ortiz-Ferrara G. Reduction in kernel weight as a potential indirect selection criterion for wheat grain yield // Plant Breed. 2008. No. 8. P. 127–241.


Review

For citations:


Galayan A.G., Medvedko S.N., Bondarev A.V., Chundyshko V.Y. Influence of agricultural machinery on the potential realization of winter hard wheat yield. New Technologies. 2021;17(1):78-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47370/2072-0920-2021-17-1-78-86

Views: 565


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0920 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0029 (Online)