Preview

New Technologies

Advanced search

Technological capabilities of statistical indicators to support the educational policy of Russia

https://doi.org/10.47370/2072-0920-2021-17-1-94-104

Abstract

The implementation of educational projects and programs requires effective support through technologies for analyzing and monitoring the education system, which requires the formation of a system of regular monitoring of education development processes using statistical indicators and their use in the process of making and supporting management decisions. Insufficient use of statistical methods in assessing educational inequality focuses on the potential for the development of the education economy through the introduction of accurate, econometrically sound approaches to measuring the level of inequality observed in the distribution of human capital. With reference to the above mentioned, the authors aim to form a methodological approach to the analysis of educational inequality through the prism of applied economic analysis based on micro data from statistical surveys and monitoring for their effective inclusion in educational policy. The agenda of the fourth Sustainable Development Goal, which promotes equal and quality education for everyone plays an important role in this context. The authors identify key areas of educational inequality in the context of the Russian education system, and propose methods for calculating statistical indicators to measure them. Calculation methods for preschool education and higher education in terms of calculating statistical indicators on learning, academic performance, skills and support for at-risk and vulnerable groups are presented. Further research should contribute to the increment of new scientific knowledge for effective scientific support of educational policy. The approach proposed in the article will make it possible to organize a system of scientific research longitudinal support of the processes occurring at all levels of education in terms of the regularity of observations and analytics of the indicator system according to the developed methodology to support managerial decision-making in the development of educational policy in Russia.

About the Authors

K. A. Avanesyan
FSAOU HE «The Southern Federal University»
Russian Federation

Karen A. Avanesyan, a leading researcher of the Academy of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Candidate of Sociology

105/42 B. Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006



M. A. Borovskaya
FSAOU HE «The Southern Federal University»
Russian Federation

Marina A. Borovskaya, president, Doctor of Economics, a professor

105/42 B. Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006



M. A. Masych
FSAOU HE «The Southern Federal University»
Russian Federation

Marina A. Masych, a leading researcher of the Center for Scientific Research «Instrumental, Mathematical and Intellectual Means in Economics», Candidate of Economics, Senior Researcher, an associate professor

105/42 B. Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006



S. A. Kochkin
FSAOU HE «The Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov»
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Kochkin, an assistant professor of the Department of Higher Mathematics, Candidate of Physics and Mathematics

17 the Severnaya Dvina embankment, Arkhangelsk, 163002



References

1. Schulz T. Investment in Human Capital // American Economic Review. 1961. Vol. 51 (1). P. 1–17.

2. Becker G.S. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis // Journal of Political Economy. 1962. Vol. 70 (5). P. 9–49.

3. Heckman J. The Economics of Inequality: The Value of Early Childhood Education // American Educator. 2011. Vol. 35 (1). P. 31–35, 47.

4. Elango S., García J.L., Heckman J.J., Hojman A. Early Childhood Education [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w21766.

5. Thomas V., Wang Y., Fan X. Measuring education inequality – Gini coefficients of education (English) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/361761468761690314/measuring-education-inequality-gini-coefficients-of-education.

6. Bennett D. Educational Inequality in the United States: Methodology and Historical Estimates of Education Gini Coefficients [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2134646.

7. Bruckauf Z., Chzhen Y. Education for All? Measuring inequality of educational outcomes among 15-year-olds across 39 industrialized nations [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.unicefirc.org/publications/pdf/IWP_2016_08.pdf.

8. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/education/.

9. http://tcg.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2020/04/Official-list-of-all-SDG-4-Indications-April-2020.pdf.

10. https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b20_102/Main.html.

11. https://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/KOUZ/survey0/index.html/

12. https://www.hse.ru/rlms/

13. https://www.oecd.org/pisa//

14. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu//

15. http://uis.unesco.org//

16. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Job-MICS-Guidebook.pdf/

17. Heckman J. Equal conditions for all children. A strategy that works. М.: MSU, 2019. 88 p.

18. Muroga A., Zaw H.T., Mizunoya S., Lin H., Brossard M., Reuge N. COVID-19: A Reason to Double Down on Investments in Pre-primary Education [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/1137-covid-19-a-reason-to-double-down-on-investments-in-pre-primaryeducation.html/

19. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174//

20. https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac//

21. https://www.gks.ru/sdg/national/


Review

For citations:


Avanesyan K.A., Borovskaya M.A., Masych M.A., Kochkin S.A. Technological capabilities of statistical indicators to support the educational policy of Russia. New Technologies. 2021;17(1):94-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47370/2072-0920-2021-17-1-94-104

Views: 461


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0920 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0029 (Online)